Re: Choice of frequency and protocol on RF links?

From: "linnix" <me@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 30 Dec 2006 20:08:42 -0800

larwe wrote:

ElderUberGeek wrote:

Hey, sorry, I didn't think it matterd that much...

It matters immensely. In the US, it's forbidden to use encryption in
the unlicensed bands, for instance.

Not for high encryption. 40 bits (WiFi) or lower is fine. As long as
the government have enough computing power to break it.

.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Choice of frequency and protocol on RF links?
  - From: larwe

References:
- Choice of frequency and protocol on RF links?
  - From: ElderUberGeek
- Re: Choice of frequency and protocol on RF links?
  - From: Vladimir Vassilevsky
- Re: Choice of frequency and protocol on RF links?
  - From: ElderUberGeek
- Re: Choice of frequency and protocol on RF links?
  - From: larwe
- Re: Choice of frequency and protocol on RF links?
  - From: ElderUberGeek
- Re: Choice of frequency and protocol on RF links?
  - From: larwe
- Re: Choice of frequency and protocol on RF links?
  - From: ElderUberGeek
- Re: Choice of frequency and protocol on RF links?
  - From: larwe

Prev by Date: Re: Choice of frequency and protocol on RF links?
Next by Date: Re: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attrib
Previous by thread: Re: Choice of frequency and protocol on RF links?
Next by thread: Re: Choice of frequency and protocol on RF links?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread