Re: Choice of frequency and protocol on RF links?
- From: "larwe" <zwsdotcom@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Dec 2006 20:11:42 -0800
linnix wrote:
It matters immensely. In the US, it's forbidden to use encryption in
the unlicensed bands, for instance.
Not for high encryption. 40 bits (WiFi) or lower is fine. As long as
the government have enough computing power to break it.
Check Part 15. It's illegal to use encryption on FRS links, amateur
radio links, SRD links, ...
Since I don't work in the 2.4GHz bands much (yet) I don't know what
special loophole is there for WEP/WPA.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Choice of frequency and protocol on RF links?
- From: Vladimir Vassilevsky
- Re: Choice of frequency and protocol on RF links?
- References:
- Choice of frequency and protocol on RF links?
- From: ElderUberGeek
- Re: Choice of frequency and protocol on RF links?
- From: Vladimir Vassilevsky
- Re: Choice of frequency and protocol on RF links?
- From: ElderUberGeek
- Re: Choice of frequency and protocol on RF links?
- From: larwe
- Re: Choice of frequency and protocol on RF links?
- From: ElderUberGeek
- Re: Choice of frequency and protocol on RF links?
- From: larwe
- Re: Choice of frequency and protocol on RF links?
- From: ElderUberGeek
- Re: Choice of frequency and protocol on RF links?
- From: larwe
- Re: Choice of frequency and protocol on RF links?
- From: linnix
- Choice of frequency and protocol on RF links?
- Prev by Date: Re: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attrib
- Next by Date: Re: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attrib
- Previous by thread: Re: Choice of frequency and protocol on RF links?
- Next by thread: Re: Choice of frequency and protocol on RF links?
- Index(es):