Re: another bizarre architecture
- From: "larwe" <zwsdotcom@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 31 Jan 2007 12:01:57 -0800
On Jan 31, 2:16 pm, Vladimir Vassilevsky <antispam_bo...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
John Larkin wrote:
This looks really weird to me...
http://www.maxim-ic.com/appnotes.cfm/appnote_number/3960
Does it resemble anything you've ever seen?
Just another small 16-bitter. From Maxim, which sounds like never use it.
It looks truly ghastly to
program.
Coding at low level is a task of compiler. BTW, do they provide decent
tools for MAXQ?
Rowley and IAR have C compilers - I've played with the IAR one and it
seems to be exactly like their other compilers with no obvious
problem. Also Phyton (but I never heard of them before). Maxim
supplies a free IDE with assembler. Very standard sort of arrangement.
For example, allowing printf() to use floats adds 3500 bytes
to a program binary.
I'd say this is not unusual for the printf() overhead.
Agreed, very standard.
.
- Prev by Date: Re: another bizarre architecture
- Next by Date: Re: Development of a distributed system based on firewire- advice needed...
- Previous by thread: Re: another bizarre architecture
- Next by thread: migrating c code for microchip compiler to hi-tech compiler
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
