Re: PIC vs ARM assembler (no flamewar please)
- From: "werty" <werty@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 17 Feb 2007 22:54:19 -0800
Its about index registers and ease of
branching and the creating Primatives
that allow you to code , w/o an assembler .
When i need to do low level , i dont
need an ISa that forces me to push/pop
every time i want to repeat the thread
on new data as the mighty Pentium
must do , for it has only 2 index registers !!
The mo index registers , the less pushing
and poping !
Also there is a way to nix CALL/RETURN
that i invented .
Its simply indirect branch thru a register
that you dedicate . It allows you to do
sub routines , but no need to RETURN .
Instead , you go directly to the next
subroutine . FAST .
ALL ARM cpu can do
[ Load PC (Rx) ]
The mighty Pentium struggles , with
JMP ( AX ) .
ARM is the fastest ISA , and its so
easy to use .
Ill be giving a free O.S. for ARM .
It is layered . 8 KB , 200KB , 5 MB .
It uses NO text , its a true GUI .
.
- References:
- PIC vs ARM assembler (no flamewar please)
- From: ucadv07
- PIC vs ARM assembler (no flamewar please)
- Prev by Date: Re: 8051 to DVI interface?
- Next by Date: Re: PIC vs ARM assembler (no flamewar please)
- Previous by thread: Re: PIC vs ARM assembler (no flamewar please)
- Next by thread: sharp 18-bit digital (6 bits/color) ?
- Index(es):