Re: Headhunter irony
- From: "Tom Lucas" <news@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 15:46:44 -0000
"BubbaGump" <BubbaGump@localhost> wrote in message
news:horau2h7lvo2j0hl58pk3rr0dk0tej0tvm@xxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 09:13:41 -0000, "Tom Lucas"<snip>
<news@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"BubbaGump" <BubbaGump@localhost> wrote in message
news:vem9u29lvmsscolipf248pibbucrhgmqh8@xxxxxxxxxx
Yesterday a headhunter contacted me about the same job for which I
had
already had two phone interviews and for which I was right in the
middle of filling out the application in preparation for an
in-person
interview that week.
It's nice to be wanted :-)
<snip>
Anyway, one thing I didn't mention is I found the company directly
through an ad they posted. I don't know if a job that's advertised
that way is good or bad, but the ability to contact them directly and
get an interview is what I found ironic. So far a headhunter has only
helped me get one interview, and that was for a job which the
headhunter admitted was having trouble finding people with certain
skills, so the company was probably just desperate.
That always a bonus because I company will certainly not want to pay a
fee to an agent and would much sooner recruit directly.
.
- References:
- Headhunter irony
- From: BubbaGump
- Re: Headhunter irony
- From: Tom Lucas
- Re: Headhunter irony
- From: BubbaGump
- Headhunter irony
- Prev by Date: Re: Remote Flashing w/ Window Client & OpenOCD
- Next by Date: Re: Academic resume gaps
- Previous by thread: Re: Headhunter irony
- Next by thread: Re: Headhunter irony
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|