Re: Embedded Bluetooth module VS USB dongle
- From: "andrew queisser" <andrewdotqueisser@xxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 20:14:23 GMT
"Clint Sharp" <clint@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:wMmE3OE0eZ+FFwJy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
The basic configuration I've sketched out on the back of the proverbial
envelope is a PIC 18F4550 (I'm already familiar with PICs and I've got
some of these chips) with an FTDI Vinculum chip hosting a USB Bluetooth
device because the Bluetooth USB dongles are considerably cheaper than OEM
Bluetooth dongles although all of the dongles I've pulled apart have had a
module fitted to a base board.
The Vinculum approach sounds cooler but if you want a BT-only recommendation
I've tried the NSC LMX9830 UART/BT converter and it's very easy to use.
https://www.national.com/ds/LM/LMX9830.pdf
Andrew
.
- References:
- Embedded Bluetooth module VS USB dongle
- From: Clint Sharp
- Embedded Bluetooth module VS USB dongle
- Prev by Date: Re: Cheap, small quad UART needed
- Next by Date: Re: Cheap, small quad UART needed
- Previous by thread: Re: Embedded Bluetooth module VS USB dongle
- Next by thread: Re: Embedded Bluetooth module VS USB dongle
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
