Re: Atmel releasing FLASH AVR32 ?
- From: "Wilco Dijkstra" <Wilco_dot_Dijkstra@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 23:46:43 GMT
"Jim Granville" <no.spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4601b38b$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
It is impossible to run code at a predictable speed, so you're
screwed no matter whether you use a cache or not.
?! - what ?
Or are you talking only within the ARM subset of the CPU universe here ?
I guess you haven't heard about interrupts, wait states, cycle
stealing DMA and other niceties then. Some of use live in the
real world...
Wilco
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Atmel releasing FLASH AVR32 ?
- From: Jim Granville
- Re: Atmel releasing FLASH AVR32 ?
- References:
- Atmel releasing FLASH AVR32 ?
- From: -jg
- Re: Atmel releasing FLASH AVR32 ?
- From: tesla
- Re: Atmel releasing FLASH AVR32 ?
- From: Ulf Samuelsson
- Re: Atmel releasing FLASH AVR32 ?
- From: Wilco Dijkstra
- Re: Atmel releasing FLASH AVR32 ?
- From: Ulf Samuelsson
- Re: Atmel releasing FLASH AVR32 ?
- From: Wilco Dijkstra
- Re: Atmel releasing FLASH AVR32 ?
- From: Ulf Samuelsson
- Re: Atmel releasing FLASH AVR32 ?
- From: Wilco Dijkstra
- Re: Atmel releasing FLASH AVR32 ?
- From: Jim Granville
- Atmel releasing FLASH AVR32 ?
- Prev by Date: Re: Atmel releasing FLASH AVR32 ?
- Next by Date: Re: Minimal BOM for bidirectional RF point-to-multipoint RF link?
- Previous by thread: Re: Atmel releasing FLASH AVR32 ?
- Next by thread: Re: Atmel releasing FLASH AVR32 ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|