Re: Best processors for trig?
- From: Tauno Voipio <tauno.voipio@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 20:06:57 GMT
larwe wrote:
On Mar 30, 1:46 pm, Tim Wescott <t...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
A floating point DSP, as noted.
What's the canonical method of doing this? Taylor series
approximations?
Of course, the arguments have to be reduced first to
the range of the period (2 * pi for sin and cos, pi
for tan). The reduced range is often split into some
sub-ranges with different coefficients.
The least-maximum error polynomial for approximation
is obtained by developing the function to a series
of Chebysev polynomials. This method gives less error
than a corresponding Taylor or MacLaurin series.
The trig functions and exponential are quite polynomial-
friendly. The most difficult of the elementary functions
is the logarithm, its Taylor series uses half of an
infinity to converge.
(Been there, done that.)
--
Tauno Voipio
tauno voipio (at) iki fi
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Best processors for trig?
- From: Paul Keinanen
- Re: Best processors for trig?
- From: CBFalconer
- Re: Best processors for trig?
- References:
- Best processors for trig?
- From: Mike Noone
- Re: Best processors for trig?
- From: Tim Wescott
- Re: Best processors for trig?
- From: larwe
- Best processors for trig?
- Prev by Date: Re: converting float to ascii w/o printf
- Next by Date: Re: Who is working with the SAM9263?
- Previous by thread: Re: Best processors for trig?
- Next by thread: Re: Best processors for trig?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|