Re: Best processors for trig?
- From: "Wilco Dijkstra" <Wilco_dot_Dijkstra@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 22:21:46 GMT
"Roberto Waltman" <usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:bc2r03hdfnahj4m5134mnlk3j7guu1bn83@xxxxxxxxxx
"larwe" <zwsdotcom@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 30, 1:46 pm, Tim Wescott <t...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
A floating point DSP, as noted.
What's the canonical method of doing this? Taylor series
approximations?
Or CORDIC.
Yes, Cordic is a good alternative. It is especially competitive if
floating point operations have a high latency (or are emulated).
You can also control accuracy so that the answers are within
1 ULP - this is pretty much impossible when using floating
point operations of the same precision as the result precision.
Wilco
.
- References:
- Best processors for trig?
- From: Mike Noone
- Re: Best processors for trig?
- From: Tim Wescott
- Re: Best processors for trig?
- From: larwe
- Re: Best processors for trig?
- From: Roberto Waltman
- Best processors for trig?
- Prev by Date: Re: Best processors for trig?
- Next by Date: Re: Who is working with the SAM9263?
- Previous by thread: Re: Best processors for trig?
- Next by thread: Re: Best processors for trig?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|