Re: cyclic redundancy check 4-bit
- From: Vladimir Vassilevsky <antispam_bogus@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 09 May 2007 13:53:53 GMT
bwv539 wrote:
Well, first of all, thanks to everybody for the answers.
I know noting about Hamming code. I am reading some information on
Wikipedia, if you have more resources please tell me. I have to
implement this in C.
That's very simple.
http://www.abvolt.com/research/research.htm#Hamming
I try to explain better my application: I have to transmit a single
bit every 80ms, so an 8-bit sequence takes 0.64s. The receiver will
trigger on the first bit and start collecting a sequence of 8 bits.
Just curious what could be such a slow system. The only thing that I can guess of is the communication to the drill head by the fluid pressure in the drill column.
The information to be transferred requires 4 bits, so I thought that a
good use of the other 4 bits is for error checking, but if there is a
way to decrease total number of bits it is better even if not strictly
required.
Then Hamming 8.4 is a way to go.
Vladimir Vassilevsky
DSP and Mixed Signal Design Consultant
http://www.abvolt.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: cyclic redundancy check 4-bit
- From: msg
- Re: cyclic redundancy check 4-bit
- From: bwv539
- Re: cyclic redundancy check 4-bit
- References:
- cyclic redundancy check 4-bit
- From: bwv539
- Re: cyclic redundancy check 4-bit
- From: Vladimir Vassilevsky
- Re: cyclic redundancy check 4-bit
- From: Dave Hansen
- Re: cyclic redundancy check 4-bit
- From: Paul Keinanen
- Re: cyclic redundancy check 4-bit
- From: bwv539
- cyclic redundancy check 4-bit
- Prev by Date: Re: pic c
- Next by Date: Re: pic c
- Previous by thread: Re: cyclic redundancy check 4-bit
- Next by thread: Re: cyclic redundancy check 4-bit
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|