Re: state of PIC SRAM on boot
- From: larwe <zwsdotcom@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 11 May 2007 11:17:07 -0700
On May 11, 12:44 pm, Donald <Don...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
FRAM != RAM
Guess what: <http://www.ramtron.com/doc/AboutFRAM/Default.asp>
"FRAM offers features consistent with a RAM technology, but is
nonvolatile like a ROM technology. FRAM bridges the gap between the
two categories and creates something completely new -- a nonvolatile
RAM."
Parallel FRAM looks pretty much exactly like SRAM from the system's
perspective; it is a drop-in replacement. e.g. <http://www.ramtron.com/
doc/Products/Nonvolatile/Detail.asp?ID=12&gr=6> is a direct drop-in
for a 62256 32Kx8 SRAM.
Not that the OP isn't on crack, of course, but your statement isn't
absolutely right, which is why it irked me to see it advertised as
such.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: state of PIC SRAM on boot
- From: Jim Granville
- Re: state of PIC SRAM on boot
- References:
- state of PIC SRAM on boot
- From: kyle york
- Re: state of PIC SRAM on boot
- From: Donald
- Re: state of PIC SRAM on boot
- From: larwe
- Re: state of PIC SRAM on boot
- From: Donald
- state of PIC SRAM on boot
- Prev by Date: Re: Simple/Fast Algorithm for binary logarithm in C (on ARM7)
- Next by Date: Re: How to fix point?
- Previous by thread: Re: state of PIC SRAM on boot
- Next by thread: Re: state of PIC SRAM on boot
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|