Re: Development kit based on ARM9 core with 2.6 linux



On 28 May 2007 01:36:10 -0700, Ali <abdulrazaq@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I need to buy a development kit based on ARM9 core (I would love if i
can find with S3C2410A chipset ), i just need (10/100) Ethernet,
atleast 2 or more serial ports and USB. The application itself won't
need a huge amount of RAM or flash. And the most important thing would
be software part, yes, it should be with 2.6.x kernel and should be
providing complete tool chain from cross-platform tool chain to boot
loader and filesystem. Or atleast should be having good documentation
to get all those tools from relevant sources. And ofcourse good
customer support would be a big catch.

thanks,
ali

I haven't looked personally, but I would guess atmel should do you a
dev-kit; they are really pedaling their ARM cores.

AS for coming with a 2.6.x kernel - a vanilla kernel cross-compiled
with a compatible GCC will be fine.

I'm not too sure of the rest of the software side of things.
--
Brendan Gillatt
www.brendangillatt.co.uk
GPG: 0x6E265E61
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Development kit based on ARM9 core with 2.6 linux
    ... providing complete tool chain from cross-platform tool chain to boot ... Or atleast should be having good documentation ... AS for coming with a 2.6.x kernel - a vanilla kernel cross-compiled ... You have u-boot and linux support in mainstream. ...
    (comp.arch.embedded)
  • Re: Development kit based on ARM9 core with 2.6 linux
    ... On May 28, 3:37 pm, Brendan Gillatt ... providing complete tool chain from cross-platform tool chain to boot ... Or atleast should be having good documentation ... AS for coming with a 2.6.x kernel - a vanilla kernel cross-compiled ...
    (comp.arch.embedded)
  • Re: Development kit based on ARM9 core with 2.6 linux
    ... atleast 2 or more serial ports and USB. ... providing complete tool chain from cross-platform tool chain to boot ... Or atleast should be having good documentation ... You have u-boot and linux support in mainstream. ...
    (comp.arch.embedded)
  • Re: Development tree, PLEASE?
    ... Documentation/stable_api_nonsense.txt about why you should get those modules into the main kernel tree. ... I'll have to get really snuggly with the whole release policy again, I was under the impression there wasn't this major of a shift going on. ... It sounds like I'll atleast be trying to provide such a 'stable patched kernel' tree fork area for people to point at, and see if there's enough interest to keep it up. ...
    (Linux-Kernel)
  • RE: [PATCH] include/linux/slab.h: new KFREE() macro.
    ... Because initialization increases code size. ... code from the kernel. ... Something has been done atleast 1000 times ... in the kernel, that looks okay. ...
    (Linux-Kernel)