What's more important optimisations or debugging?
- From: rhapgood@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 30 May 2007 15:15:07 -0700
I'm trying to get a feel for what people now consider more important,
optimisations or debugging ability. In the past with such tight memory
limits I would have said optimisations but now with expanded-memory
parts becoming cheaper I would think that debugging ability is more
important in a development tool. It's is not exactly a black and
white question, debug or smallused, but more a ratio. eg. 50% debug/
50% optimised or 70% debug/30% optimised, etc.
Any feedback would be greatly appreciated.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: What's more important optimisations or debugging?
- From: GMM50
- Re: What's more important optimisations or debugging?
- From: Dave Hansen
- Re: What's more important optimisations or debugging?
- From: Vladimir Vassilevsky
- Re: What's more important optimisations or debugging?
- From: BubbaGump
- Re: What's more important optimisations or debugging?
- Prev by Date: Re: Video or Mac ? Divx work or not work?
- Next by Date: Re: Trust 1-man headhunter operation?
- Previous by thread: Video or Mac ? Divx work or not work?
- Next by thread: Re: What's more important optimisations or debugging?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|