Re: What's more important optimisations or debugging?
- From: Ryan H <rhapgood@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 May 2007 17:38:39 -0700
On May 31, 9:21 am, BubbaGump <BubbaGump@localhost> wrote:
I don't understand the question. Debugging features in a development
tool or extra debugging information in executable code?
The question refers to debugging features in a toolsuite. When
choosing a set of tools for a particular project would you place more
emphasis on finding a compiler/IDE combination that makes for easy
accurate debugging or finding one [compiler] that can produce the most
optimal code? Alternatively you may go for tools that do neither
exceptionally well but do both in an 'OK' manner.
I know it's more complicated than it seems but sometimes you have to
step away from the details and just look at the big picture, that's
what I'm trying to do here.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: What's more important optimisations or debugging?
- From: Hans-Bernhard Bröker
- Re: What's more important optimisations or debugging?
- From: Colin Paul Gloster
- Re: What's more important optimisations or debugging?
- From: Jim Granville
- Re: What's more important optimisations or debugging?
- References:
- What's more important optimisations or debugging?
- From: rhapgood
- Re: What's more important optimisations or debugging?
- From: BubbaGump
- What's more important optimisations or debugging?
- Prev by Date: Re: What's more important optimisations or debugging?
- Next by Date: Re: What's more important optimisations or debugging?
- Previous by thread: Re: What's more important optimisations or debugging?
- Next by thread: Re: What's more important optimisations or debugging?
- Index(es):