Re: What's more important optimisations or debugging?
- From: Colin Paul Gloster <Colin_Paul_Gloster@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 31 May 2007 09:34:04 GMT
In news:1180571919.025883.219930@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
timestamped 30 May 2007 17:38:39 -0700, Ryan H <rhapgood@xxxxxxxxx>
posted:
"On May 31, 9:21 am, BubbaGump <BubbaGump@localhost> wrote:
> I don't understand the question. Debugging features in a development
> tool or extra debugging information in executable code?
The question refers to debugging features in a toolsuite. [..]
[..]"
Has anyone experience or impressions of debuggers which allow stepping
backwards in time through program flow, such as apparently provided
for desktops/workstations by UndoDB (
WWW.Undo-Software.com
) and Java (Virtual Machine?) debuggers? If so, for which processors
and with which tools? I imagine it would be possible to pay Undo
Limited to port a version of its debugger which would be compatible
with any of the targets supported by the GNU DeBugger GDB as UndoDB is
a wrapper for GDB.
Curious,
Colin Paul Gloster
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: What's more important optimisations or debugging?
- From: David Brown
- Re: What's more important optimisations or debugging?
- References:
- What's more important optimisations or debugging?
- From: rhapgood
- Re: What's more important optimisations or debugging?
- From: BubbaGump
- Re: What's more important optimisations or debugging?
- From: Ryan H
- What's more important optimisations or debugging?
- Prev by Date: Re: Trust 1-man headhunter operation?
- Next by Date: Re: What's more important optimisations or debugging?
- Previous by thread: Re: What's more important optimisations or debugging?
- Next by thread: Re: What's more important optimisations or debugging?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|