Re: What's more important optimisations or debugging?
- From: GMM50 <gfm5050@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 31 May 2007 13:14:16 -0700
On May 30, 6:15 pm, rhapg...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
I'm trying to get a feel for what people now consider more important,
optimisations or debugging ability. In the past with such tight memory
limits I would have said optimisations but now with expanded-memory
parts becoming cheaper I would think that debugging ability is more
important in a development tool. It's is not exactly a black and
white question, debug or smallused, but more a ratio. eg. 50% debug/
50% optimised or 70% debug/30% optimised, etc.
Any feedback would be greatly appreciated.
1. Debug
2. Debug
3. Debug
If it's slow you will have a chance to fix it.
If it's broke most customer will have moved on.
But the choice is yours.
gm
.
- References:
- What's more important optimisations or debugging?
- From: rhapgood
- What's more important optimisations or debugging?
- Prev by Date: Re: an interesting CAN driver issue
- Next by Date: Just for CBF
- Previous by thread: Re: What's more important optimisations or debugging?
- Next by thread: Good document on USB.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|