Re: LPC900/80C51 Compiler Toolchain
- From: Paul Taylor <paul_ng_pls_rem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 17:36:48 +0100
On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 08:54:36 +0100, Chris Hills wrote:
In article <1182372529.740274.209910@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
eugenios@xxxxxxxxx writes
I would suggest in this order
Keil
IAR
Raisonance
Rigel
SDCC
Keil and IAR are very much more advanced than the rest. Keil
particularly can do aggressive data overlaying which is often more
crucial than the limit on memory addressing the eval version.
Anyone got any figures comparing any of these with gcc? Maybe for a
bit of open source software? (e.g. Lewin's DOSFS - or a another similar
sized project). How big is it when compiled with gcc, and with any of the
above compilers. I'm more interested in code size rather than run-time
performance.
Regards,
Paul Taylor.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: LPC900/80C51 Compiler Toolchain
- From: Chris Hills
- Re: LPC900/80C51 Compiler Toolchain
- From: Paul Taylor
- Re: LPC900/80C51 Compiler Toolchain
- References:
- LPC900/80C51 Compiler Toolchain
- From: eugenios
- Re: LPC900/80C51 Compiler Toolchain
- From: Chris Hills
- LPC900/80C51 Compiler Toolchain
- Prev by Date: Re: CAN Protocol Analyzers
- Next by Date: Re: New ARM Cortex Microcontroller Product Family from STMicroelectronics
- Previous by thread: Re: LPC900/80C51 Compiler Toolchain
- Next by thread: Re: LPC900/80C51 Compiler Toolchain
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|