Re: Open Source EC++ Implementation?
- From: Himanshu Chauhan <hs.chauhan@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 21:42:58 +0530
Chris Hills wrote:
In article <GGmri.10446$ae7.3602@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Michael N.
Moran <mnmoran@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes
Chris Hills wrote:
C++ isn't modular but C is.
I hope you'll forgive me, but will you
please elaborate on this claim?
A little facetious but C is modular and C++ OO :-)
You can do quite good OO programming in C too though both quite the same
as there is no inheritance.
It seemed the OP had the answer before asking the question. He had
chosen C++ regardless of how appropriate it was and would damned well
make it fit.
No, I didn't have the answer. EC++ was on my mind but I was looking for
good arguments to deny its use. Everybody has its own arguments but I
found that nobody actually uses the standards of EC++. You are more
experienced guys. So I would crap my idea of using EC++ or C++ for that
matter because I need to run on 8-bitters.
--Himanshu
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Open Source EC++ Implementation?
- From: Chris Hills
- Re: Open Source EC++ Implementation?
- References:
- Open Source EC++ Implementation?
- From: Himanshu Chauhan
- Re: Open Source EC++ Implementation?
- From: John Devereux
- Re: Open Source EC++ Implementation?
- From: Chris Hills
- Re: Open Source EC++ Implementation?
- From: Himanshu Chauhan
- Re: Open Source EC++ Implementation?
- From: Chris Hills
- Re: Open Source EC++ Implementation?
- From: Michael N. Moran
- Re: Open Source EC++ Implementation?
- From: Chris Hills
- Open Source EC++ Implementation?
- Prev by Date: Re: Rabbit 4k and ethernet
- Next by Date: Re: Open Source EC++ Implementation?
- Previous by thread: Re: Open Source EC++ Implementation?
- Next by thread: Re: Open Source EC++ Implementation?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|