Re: LPC or SAM7?
- From: "FreeRTOS.org" <noemail@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 17:22:42 GMT
Other than the details of the peripherals, the main difference between
the SAM7 and the LPC2 lines are the speed of the CPU and the DMA. The
LPC parts run a bit faster with the SAM7 requiring a wait state at
speeds above 30 MHz, IIRC and top out at 55 MHz. Some LPC devices
rurn at up to 70 MHz for inline code with no wait states, although
branches require a flush of the memory buffer. The SAM7 parts can use
DMA for peripheral access while the LPC must use program controlled I/
O.
Just to add to that, I think also the SAM7 parts have a memory interfaced
designed predominently for efficient THUMB mode code. They will be slower
in ARM mode. Someone correct me if this is wrong.
I particularly like the DMA interface on the SAM7 peripherals. It frees up
a lot of CPU cycles for you.
--
Regards,
Richard.
+ http://www.FreeRTOS.org
A free real time kernel for 8, 16 and 32bit systems.
+ http://www.SafeRTOS.com
An IEC 61508 certified real time kernel for safety related systems.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: LPC or SAM7?
- From: John Devereux
- Re: LPC or SAM7?
- References:
- LPC or SAM7?
- From: Anthony Fremont
- Re: LPC or SAM7?
- From: rickman
- LPC or SAM7?
- Prev by Date: Re: LPC or SAM7?
- Next by Date: Re: LPC or SAM7?
- Previous by thread: Re: LPC or SAM7?
- Next by thread: Re: LPC or SAM7?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|