Re: finding sample rate
- From: Wills <wills.kingspanama@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 22:05:27 -0700
On Aug 29, 4:03 pm, Colin Paul Gloster <Colin_Paul_Glos...@xxxxxxx>
wrote:
On 2007-08-29, Wills <wills.kingspan...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
|-------------------------------------------------------------------|
|"[..]If I have to take FFT should I sample the signal only in |
|powers of 2[..]?" |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------|
No, unless you are using something (e.g. a library) which needs you to.
|-------------------------------------------------------------------|
|"(2 power 20 samples or 2 power 21 samples, ofcourse |
|atleast >6000 samples)?" |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------|
2 to the power of 20 is >6000. 2 to the power of 13 is 8192 which is
the smallest number >6000 which can be obtained by raising 2 to the
power of a natural number.
Good luck,
Colin Paul Gloster
Thanks.
Should the number of samples be 2 power x?
Thanks in advance.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: finding sample rate
- From: baranovus
- Re: finding sample rate
- References:
- finding sample rate
- From: Wills
- Re: finding sample rate
- From: Colin Paul Gloster
- finding sample rate
- Prev by Date: Re: Safe way to write interrupt driven circular buffer tx rx?
- Next by Date: Re: Creating a cheap wireless "server" with BSD.
- Previous by thread: Re: finding sample rate
- Next by thread: Re: finding sample rate
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|