Re: finding sample rate
- From: baranovus@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 18:22:04 -0000
On Aug 30, 1:05 am, Wills <wills.kingspan...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Aug 29, 4:03 pm, Colin Paul Gloster <Colin_Paul_Glos...@xxxxxxx>
wrote:
On 2007-08-29, Wills <wills.kingspan...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
|-------------------------------------------------------------------|
|"[..]If I have to take FFT should I sample the signal only in |
|powers of 2[..]?" |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------|
No, unless you are using something (e.g. a library) which needs you to.
|-------------------------------------------------------------------|
|"(2 power 20 samples or 2 power 21 samples, ofcourse |
|atleast >6000 samples)?" |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------|
2 to the power of 20 is >6000. 2 to the power of 13 is 8192 which is
the smallest number >6000 which can be obtained by raising 2 to the
power of a natural number.
Good luck,
Colin Paul Gloster
Thanks.
Should the number of samples be 2 power x?
Thanks in advance.
For FFT you should have 2^N number of samples, but you don't have to
have 2^M value of sampling frequency. Choose it basing on the
rejection factor of your anti-aliasing filter.
Good luck,
Alex.
.
- References:
- finding sample rate
- From: Wills
- Re: finding sample rate
- From: Colin Paul Gloster
- Re: finding sample rate
- From: Wills
- finding sample rate
- Prev by Date: Re: [OT] Freescale English?
- Next by Date: Re: thread safe fat
- Previous by thread: Re: finding sample rate
- Next by thread: About stepper motors controlling (help)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|