Re: 16/32 bit processor for OS development
- From: "Steve at fivetrees" <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 00:49:13 +0100
"Ed Prochak" <edprochak@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1189018042.653065.148710@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
The key point is, as I like to phrase it, that an embedded system
looks like a "whatever" device to the end user. The end user should
not perceive that there is a computer involved. They might be aware
there is a computer used but they do not interact with the device like
they do a PC. That's what makes it embedded, not the size, cost,
realtime constraints, custom peripherals or other contstraints.
Yup.
Steve
http://www.fivetrees.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 16/32 bit processor for OS development
- From: Jonathan Kirwan
- Re: 16/32 bit processor for OS development
- References:
- 16/32 bit processor for OS development
- From: Lax
- Re: 16/32 bit processor for OS development
- From: Chris Hills
- Re: 16/32 bit processor for OS development
- From: Guy Macon
- Re: 16/32 bit processor for OS development
- From: tesla
- Re: 16/32 bit processor for OS development
- From: Guy Macon
- Re: 16/32 bit processor for OS development
- From: tesla
- Re: 16/32 bit processor for OS development
- From: Ed Prochak
- 16/32 bit processor for OS development
- Prev by Date: Re: Floppy emulator with flash media
- Next by Date: Re: 16/32 bit processor for OS development
- Previous by thread: Re: 16/32 bit processor for OS development
- Next by thread: Re: 16/32 bit processor for OS development
- Index(es):