Re: Which PIC18 C Compiler?
- From: Chris Hills <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 14:35:08 +0100
In message <m3lkb1y0t2.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Rich Walker <rw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes
Chris Hills <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
You will not get a fully ISO C compliant compiler for the PIC. It's architecture will not permit
it. You need to write C for the PIC not portable C is you want to get any sort of efficiency out of
it.
Just out of interest, which bits of ISO C can't the PIC do?
Which ISO C?
This is not a trick question.
--
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
\/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills Staffs England /\/\/\/\/
/\/\/ chris@xxxxxxxxxxxx www.phaedsys.org \/\/\
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Which PIC18 C Compiler?
- From: Robert Adsett
- Re: Which PIC18 C Compiler?
- From: CBFalconer
- Re: Which PIC18 C Compiler?
- References:
- Re: Which PIC18 C Compiler?
- From: drwho
- Re: Which PIC18 C Compiler?
- From: Chris Hills
- Re: Which PIC18 C Compiler?
- From: Rich Walker
- Re: Which PIC18 C Compiler?
- Prev by Date: [ANN] XSD/e 1.1.0 - validating XML parser generator for embedded systems
- Next by Date: Re: Which PIC18 C Compiler?
- Previous by thread: Re: Which PIC18 C Compiler?
- Next by thread: Re: Which PIC18 C Compiler?
- Index(es):