Re: ARM9 choices
- From: kert <kaidokert@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 19:05:06 -0000
On Oct 3, 8:55 pm, Frank-Christian Kruegel <dontmai...@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On Wed, 03 Oct 2007 16:05:25 -0000, kert <kaidok...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
And, AT91 series. Again, very widely available, popular chip. No
integrated LCD i/f.
Wrong: AT91SAM9263http://www.atmel.com/dyn/products/product_card.asp?part_id=4056
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Frank-Christian Krügel
For the love of god, i dont understand how this slipped my radar. I
know i looked at full range of Atmel ARMs but somehow discounted
SAM92xx
series early on , i dont know what i was thinking.
Its a fairly new part though, doesnt seem like there are many vendors
with devkits out yet, neither is there oob support there from eCos/
RTEMS/FreeRTOS, but thats not a big obstacle.
Good suggestion, thanks.
-kert
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ARM9 choices
- From: Ulf Samuelsson
- Re: ARM9 choices
- References:
- ARM9 choices
- From: kert
- Re: ARM9 choices
- From: Frank-Christian Kruegel
- ARM9 choices
- Prev by Date: Re: ARM9 choices
- Next by Date: Re: ARM9 choices
- Previous by thread: Re: ARM9 choices
- Next by thread: Re: ARM9 choices
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|