Re: ARM9 choices
- From: "Ulf Samuelsson" <ulf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 22:40:32 +0200
"kert" <kaidokert@xxxxxxxxx> skrev i meddelandet
news:1191438306.464113.300350@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Oct 3, 8:55 pm, Frank-Christian Kruegel <dontmai...@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On Wed, 03 Oct 2007 16:05:25 -0000, kert <kaidok...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
And, AT91 series. Again, very widely available, popular chip. No
integrated LCD i/f.
Wrong:
AT91SAM9263http://www.atmel.com/dyn/products/product_card.asp?part_id=4056
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Frank-Christian Krügel
For the love of god, i dont understand how this slipped my radar. I
know i looked at full range of Atmel ARMs but somehow discounted
SAM92xx
series early on , i dont know what i was thinking.
Its a fairly new part though, doesnt seem like there are many vendors
with devkits out yet, neither is there oob support there from eCos/
RTEMS/FreeRTOS, but thats not a big obstacle.
Good suggestion, thanks.
-kert
The peripheral set of the AT91 series is fairly standardized
so if you have at least one supported, it is a piece of cake
to have another (like the SAM9263) supported.
--
Best Regards,
Ulf Samuelsson
This is intended to be my personal opinion which may,
or may not be shared by my employer Atmel Nordic AB
.
- References:
- ARM9 choices
- From: kert
- Re: ARM9 choices
- From: Frank-Christian Kruegel
- Re: ARM9 choices
- From: kert
- ARM9 choices
- Prev by Date: Re: ARM9 choices
- Next by Date: Re: Synchronized SPI communication
- Previous by thread: Re: ARM9 choices
- Next by thread: Re: ARM9 choices
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|