Re: Delay Routine: Fully-portable C89 if possible
- From: Hans-Bernhard Bröker <HBBroeker@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 19:15:42 +0200
Martin Wells wrote:
You can be fully portable and efficient at the same time.
Then why is the method you propose completely unportable?
#if VALUE_BITS(char unsigned) == N
I've informed you days ago that such a VALUE_BITS functionality doesn't exist.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Delay Routine: Fully-portable C89 if possible
- From: Martin Wells
- Re: Delay Routine: Fully-portable C89 if possible
- References:
- Delay Routine: Fully-portable C89 if possible
- From: Martin Wells
- Re: Delay Routine: Fully-portable C89 if possible
- From: David Brown
- Re: Delay Routine: Fully-portable C89 if possible
- From: Martin Wells
- Re: Delay Routine: Fully-portable C89 if possible
- From: John Devereux
- Re: Delay Routine: Fully-portable C89 if possible
- From: David Brown
- Re: Delay Routine: Fully-portable C89 if possible
- From: CBFalconer
- Re: Delay Routine: Fully-portable C89 if possible
- From: David Brown
- Re: Delay Routine: Fully-portable C89 if possible
- From: Martin Wells
- Re: Delay Routine: Fully-portable C89 if possible
- From: Grant Edwards
- Re: Delay Routine: Fully-portable C89 if possible
- From: Martin Wells
- Delay Routine: Fully-portable C89 if possible
- Prev by Date: Re: Delay Routine: Fully-portable C89 if possible
- Next by Date: Re: Delay Routine: Fully-portable C89 if possible
- Previous by thread: Re: Delay Routine: Fully-portable C89 if possible
- Next by thread: Re: Delay Routine: Fully-portable C89 if possible
- Index(es):