Re: Serial Flash Protected Area
- From: Jim Granville <no.spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 14:01:44 +1300
Vladimir Vassilevsky wrote:
Is there any reason why the SPI flash chips always have the protected area in the upper addresses at the end of the available memory?
All of the CPUs that I know start booting from the SPI flash by reading some information which begins at the address 0. So if the beginning of the flash gets corrupt, then the CPU is dead and we can't reprogram the flash by software. Therefore it seems logical to protect the beginning of the flash, not the end.
But why the protection is always done in the opposite way? Is there any logical reason for that?
I think it carries over from Serial EEPROMs, and pre-dates booting from
Serial memory. In Serial EE's it allowed some small protected area, above the normal data-storage area, and given the widely varying sizes
of Serial EE (but all with common 0000 address point) to protect the
top area, away from the data space.
I'm waiting for 'run from serial memory', as the next step, for
code that does not need to be fast :)
-jg
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Serial Flash Protected Area
- From: Vladimir Vassilevsky
- Re: Serial Flash Protected Area
- References:
- Serial Flash Protected Area
- From: Vladimir Vassilevsky
- Serial Flash Protected Area
- Prev by Date: Serial Flash Protected Area
- Next by Date: Urgent!!! SST Support Engineer for UAE
- Previous by thread: Serial Flash Protected Area
- Next by thread: Re: Serial Flash Protected Area
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
