Re: PIC18 Pseudo-Instructions
- From: PigPOg <simon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 12:30:32 +0000
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 08:01:25 -0500, Spehro Pefhany
<speffSNIP@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 10:29:41 +0000, the renowned PigPOg
<simon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi. Can anyone advise please?
I'm migrating code from a base device to a PIC18Fxxx. No real problems
except the original code uses Pseudo-Instructions and I can't find
equivalent(s) for the higher-end devices. Do they exist for the 18F
parts or do I have to take say, CLRC and use BCF STATUS,C instead?
Cheers,
Simon
AFAIUI, Microchip is discouraging the use of pseudo instructions even
for the 12 & 14 bit cores. I think it's a good idea to get rid of
them, particularly the ones that generate more than one instruction.
If you must have them, simply write some macros, but I would
definitely use upper case so it's obvious that they are macros.
Best regards,
Spehro Pefhany
Thanks Spehro - someone on the Microchip forum has suggested Macros as
well. I'll do this instead.
Ta,
Simon
.
- References:
- PIC18 Pseudo-Instructions
- From: PigPOg
- Re: PIC18 Pseudo-Instructions
- From: Spehro Pefhany
- PIC18 Pseudo-Instructions
- Prev by Date: Ampro MightyBoard USB issues?
- Next by Date: Re: PIC18 Pseudo-Instructions
- Previous by thread: Re: PIC18 Pseudo-Instructions
- Next by thread: Re: PIC18 Pseudo-Instructions
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
