Re: programming atmega48/168's
- From: dbr@xxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2007 13:12:26 +0000 (UTC)
Programing method is serial. I forgot that in the last message.
Hul
Hul Tytus <ht@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
comp.arch.embedded
programming atmega48/168's
I have been programming an atmega168 for the the last few weeks with
no trouble. Today an atmega48 was put in the 168's place, and the programming
failed. From a quick look, there appeared to be a timeout when polling the
flash af0ter a buffer had been written. That was a quick look at the end of
the day, though.
Has anyone here found differences in the programing of the two
versions that might explain this error?
Hul.
- References:
- programming atmega48/168's
- From: Hul Tytus
- programming atmega48/168's
- Prev by Date: Re: 32bit PICs announced
- Next by Date: Re: Embedded systems publishers
- Previous by thread: programming atmega48/168's
- Next by thread: Re: programming atmega48/168's
- Index(es):