Re: programming atmega48/168's
- From: David Kelly <n4hhe@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2007 09:25:01 -0600
Hul Tytus wrote:
comp.arch.embedded
programming atmega48/168's
I have been programming an atmega168 for the the last few weeks with no trouble. Today an atmega48 was put in the 168's place, and the programming failed. From a quick look, there appeared to be a timeout when polling the flash af0ter a buffer had been written. That was a quick look at the end of the day, though.
Has anyone here found differences in the programing of the two versions that might explain this error?
Am not having any problems programming a 48 over DebugWire with a Dragon. Quite to the contrary, it works great once DW is enabled via ISP. Having more problems keeping a connection with a 164P over JTAG, wishing for DW on the 164P.
My 48 is running from internal oscillator at roughly 8 MHz.
.
- References:
- programming atmega48/168's
- From: Hul Tytus
- programming atmega48/168's
- Prev by Date: Re: gcc for M16C/M32C
- Next by Date: Re: 32bit PICs announced
- Previous by thread: Re: programming atmega48/168's
- Next by thread: Re: programming atmega48/168's
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
