Re: programming atmega48/168's

On 09/11/2007 Hul Tytus wrote:

comp.arch.embedded
programming atmega48/168's

I have been programming an atmega168 for the the last few weeks with
no trouble. Today an atmega48 was put in the 168's place, and the
programming failed. From a quick look, there appeared to be a timeout
when polling the flash af0ter a buffer had been written. That was a
quick look at the end of the day, though.
Has anyone here found differences in the programing of the two
versions that might explain this error?

Hul

Apart from the obvious differences of Flash and RAM size, what are your
fuse settings? The fuses in the mega48 behave differently from those in
the 88/168.

--
John B
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: AVR Butterfly
    ... I did read the Butterfly docs. ... SO, if the other fuse settings are as stated in the manual, now the clock ... For programming this one, I have been using the boot-loader and serial ...
    (comp.arch.embedded)
  • Re: AVR Butterfly
    ... > I did read the Butterfly docs. ... > In the code the clock prescaler is put explicitely to do the job of ... > SO, if the other fuse settings are as stated in the manual, now the clock ... > For programming this one, I have been using the boot-loader and serial ...
    (comp.arch.embedded)
  • Re: programming atmega48/168s
    ... I have been programming an atmega168 for the the last few weeks with no trouble. ... Today an atmega48 was put in the 168's place, ... Am not having any problems programming a 48 over DebugWire with a Dragon. ...
    (comp.arch.embedded)
  • programming atmega48/168s
    ... I have been programming an atmega168 for the the last few weeks with ... no trouble. ... Today an atmega48 was put in the 168's place, ... flash af0ter a buffer had been written. ...
    (comp.arch.embedded)