Re: Any uC manufacturers have free c compilers?


Grant Edwards <grante@xxxxxxxx> writes:
http://www.redhat.com/services/custom/gnupro/

Are the versions shipped really as ancient as those listed on
the page (gcc 2.95.3, gdb 4.0)? Or does the "and above" mean
that later versions are also being shipped. [I think most
people would be more interested to know the most recent version
supported rather than the oldest version supported.]

After talking with the powers that be, I decided to rewrite the
confusing sections myself, and they agreed to use my changes.
Hopefully it's more obvious what we do, without miscommunicating
anything.

Thanks for the feedback!

DJ
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: COM/COM+ Components running in Linux?
    ... COM is ancient. ... They now push .NET... ... I think you're confusing M$ pushing DCOM/MTS with COM. ...
    (alt.os.linux)
  • Re: 64 bit or 32 bit
    ... Grant Edwards writes: ... > It really get's confusing when we need even more types and ... > OTOH, if you want a certain number of bits, you should probably ... Måns Rullgård ...
    (comp.os.linux.development.system)
  • Re: whats wrong with a pic ?
    ... Grant Edwards wrote: ... Except the PIC is ancient -- it was desined over 30 years ago. ... it was introduced in 1985 but it was based on a design over 10 years old ... it was a retrograde step. ...
    (comp.arch.embedded)
  • Re: Bit width?
    ... Grant Edwards wrote in ... > The confusing thing is that a monetary bit is a half of a ... Which would be par for the course for the antiquated measurement system ...
    (comp.arch.embedded)