Re: regarding ISR

On 2008-01-29, Paul Keinanen <keinanen@xxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 00:15:59 +0100, David Brown
<david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

However, I
don't really buy your idea that SMS-speak is saving costs. You don't
pay per letter for SMS messages (at least, I've never heard of such a
scheme) - you pay per message. SMS abbreviations are nothing more than
laziness.

If someone is really posting questions using SMS messages, how is that
person going to receive messages posted by other users ?

Possibly via an SMS<->email gateway?

If by SMS, that would imply that the sending a single message
is very expensive but you can receive an unlimited amount SMS
messages for free. Is there really such a service anywhere in
the world ?

Not for free, but for a fixed price.

--
Grant Edwards grante Yow! Jesuit priests are
at DATING CAREER DIPLOMATS!!
visi.com
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Wireless Phones (Re: ts in Tagalog)
    ... I pay only 12p for a quick text; ... I read that 2.958 billion SMS messages were ... sent in Denmark during the first six months of 2004. ... cell phones for every 100 persons and a bit over 100 messages per ...
    (sci.lang)
  • Re: regarding ISR
    ... don't really buy your idea that SMS-speak is saving costs. ... scheme) - you pay per message. ... If someone is really posting questions using SMS messages, ...
    (comp.arch.embedded)