Re: RTS CTS Problem
- From: Didi <dp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 12:57:00 -0800 (PST)
By _low_ do you mean 0 on the AVR GPIO, sorry just clarifying.
Yes.
When will RS232 be banned? :- {)
Hah, it is that more or less is already - try to buy a laptop with
it. :-)
It is still pretty useful for lowest level debugging etc., at the very
begining of projects or when not all of the stuff is functional.
Dimiter
------------------------------------------------------
Dimiter Popoff Transgalactic Instruments
http://www.tgi-sci.com
------------------------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/didi_tgi/sets/72157600228621276/
On Jan 30, 9:57 pm, ratemonotonic <niladri1...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 30 Jan, 19:38, Didi <d...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
the problem is that when I set the CTS AVR GPIO high(1) the voltage
that I see the 9 way connector pin is -5v and when I set CTS AVR GPIO
to low(0) the voltage on the 9 way connector is 0v.
Is that the expected behavior? I think i am missing some fundamental
concept.
It is the expected behaviour allright if the buffers you use are
inverting (they normally are).
But you need to drive CTS _low_ to enable data flow, not high.
This is how all CTS inputs (past buffers, at TTL level) I have
seen work. :-)
By _low_ do you mean 0 on the AVR GPIO, sorry just clarifying. When
will RS232 be banned? :- {)
.
- References:
- RTS CTS Problem
- From: ratemonotonic
- Re: RTS CTS Problem
- From: Didi
- Re: RTS CTS Problem
- From: ratemonotonic
- RTS CTS Problem
- Prev by Date: Re: RTS CTS Problem
- Next by Date: Re: searching embedded system
- Previous by thread: Re: RTS CTS Problem
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|