Re: CPU AND peripheral clocks
- From: "Ulf Samuelsson" <ulf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 22:06:24 +0100
Why are peripheral clocks divided by 2 or 4 or by 8 times of the CPU
clock?
Why can't they run at CPU core clock speed?
This is just a general question and not restricted to any processor or
architecture.
Its as simple as this ...PERIPHERALS ARE SLOWER than processor.
-dK
Not neccessarily, there are several AVR's implementing a PLL
which will allow a timer to run at 64 MHz, while the CPU core
is running 1-8 MHz.
Many AT91 processors implement a dual PLL, allowing the CPU
to run at one clock frequency, while other things (like USB) run
at a higher clock frequency.
--
Best Regards,
Ulf Samuelsson
This is intended to be my personal opinion which may,
or may not be shared by my employer Atmel Nordic AB
.
- References:
- CPU AND peripheral clocks
- From: vivek
- Re: CPU AND peripheral clocks
- From: dk
- CPU AND peripheral clocks
- Prev by Date: Re: X-Mega AVRs are here!
- Next by Date: Re: New STM8 Microcontroller from STMicroelectronics is ST7 Upgrade
- Previous by thread: Re: CPU AND peripheral clocks
- Next by thread: Re: CPU AND peripheral clocks
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|