Re: microcontrollers for process control
- From: Spehro Pefhany <speffSNIP@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 18:17:46 -0400
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 23:08:48 -0500, CBFalconer <cbfalconer@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
"a_edwards" <eecoding@xxxxxxxxxxx> skrev:... snip ...
yes that is good thanks. But i want a example of what is
currently used ny a manufacturer. If the system was for a large
building would not they use a 16 bit micro?
Yes, it is not well known but if the building has more than 8
levels, you *have* to use a 16 bit controller or better! If it
goes beyond 16 levels, you have to move up to a 32 bitter ;-)
If I hadn't been so lazy, I would have applied for a U.S. patent
for using a 32 bit MCU in a fire alarm if the building has more
than 16 levels.
Either that is utter nonsense or I am missing something. There is
no relation between interrupts available and 'levels'. There is a
relationship between code complexity and levels. And someone has
to decide how to break up the interrupts. But one would suffice,
combined with suitable i/o.
No, I think you'd definitely need a 32-bitter if there are more than
16 floors (including penthouse, basement and sub-basement levels).
They must use something like ganged 64-bit processors for Taipei 101.
Best regards,
Spehro Pefhany
--
"it's the network..." "The Journey is the reward"
speff@xxxxxxxxxxxx Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com
Embedded software/hardware/analog Info for designers: http://www.speff.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: microcontrollers for process control
- From: Jim Granville
- Re: microcontrollers for process control
- From: Ulf Samuelsson
- Re: microcontrollers for process control
- References:
- microcontrollers for process control
- From: a_edwards
- Re: microcontrollers for process control
- From: a_edwards
- Re: microcontrollers for process control
- From: Ulf Samuelsson
- Re: microcontrollers for process control
- From: CBFalconer
- microcontrollers for process control
- Prev by Date: Re: FPGA vs. ARM MCU for floating point operations
- Next by Date: Re: Availability AT89LS51 or AT89LS52
- Previous by thread: Re: microcontrollers for process control
- Next by thread: Re: microcontrollers for process control
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|