Re: FPGA vs. ARM MCU for floating point operations
- From: "Ulf Samuelsson" <ulf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:19:03 +0100
"Jim Granville" <no.spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> skrev i meddelandet
news:47d9cecf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
Hi Ulf - unfortunately, none of the solutions you mentioned has CAN.
"There is an ARM9 + 1 Gflops floating point DSP coming,..."
This one has two CAN controllers...
No open source compiler for the DSP though
What package, and Memory ?
-jg
It is BGA, but the development board will be in the form
of a CPU Module, (70 x 80 mm) with 16 MB NOR Flash
256 MB NAND Flash and 64 MB SDRAM and a PHY.
There will be 3 x 120 pin FCI Bergstak connectors on the module.
There is also a baseboard with normal connectors.
This means that anyone can use the part, even if they do not like BGA.
I have a module, but there are not a lot around at this time.
Runs U-Boot & Linux.
--
Best Regards,
Ulf Samuelsson
This is intended to be my personal opinion which may,
or may not be shared by my employer Atmel Nordic AB
.
- References:
- FPGA vs. ARM MCU for floating point operations
- From: Michael
- Re: FPGA vs. ARM MCU for floating point operations
- From: Ulf Samuelsson
- Re: FPGA vs. ARM MCU for floating point operations
- From: Michael
- Re: FPGA vs. ARM MCU for floating point operations
- From: Ulf Samuelsson
- Re: FPGA vs. ARM MCU for floating point operations
- From: Jim Granville
- FPGA vs. ARM MCU for floating point operations
- Prev by Date: Re: Easy Question about USB Hardware Design
- Next by Date: Orcad vs. Open Source
- Previous by thread: Re: FPGA vs. ARM MCU for floating point operations
- Next by thread: Re: FPGA vs. ARM MCU for floating point operations
- Index(es):