Re: Does Microchip play fast and loose with the GPL?
- From: Eric <englere_geo@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 19:15:18 -0700 (PDT)
On Mar 19, 10:01 pm, DJ Delorie <d...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Eric <englere_...@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
Do you know offhand which define symbol this is?
It's in gcc/config/pic30/pic30.c. Look for LICENSE_MANAGER.
The linker may have similar code, too.
I agree that if they are distributing the license checking code then
it would appear they aren't violating the GPL.
It's a really short bit of source, too. Exec a child process with
some arguments, see what it returns, maybe shut off some options.
I found it. This is not a problem at all.
But what about the C32 compiler for the PIC32? I can't see anything
like this there.
The reason I'm asking is because I wanted to try out the PIC32 family
but I can't afford the fee to buy the compiler, and a 64K limit is
quite small for a 32 bit processor.
If I can't have an unlimited compiler then I'll definitely pass on the
PIC32 chip family. The AVR32 has an unrestricted free compiler.
Eric
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Does Microchip play fast and loose with the GPL?
- From: DJ Delorie
- Re: Does Microchip play fast and loose with the GPL?
- References:
- Does Microchip play fast and loose with the GPL?
- From: Eric
- Re: Does Microchip play fast and loose with the GPL?
- From: DJ Delorie
- Re: Does Microchip play fast and loose with the GPL?
- From: Eric
- Re: Does Microchip play fast and loose with the GPL?
- From: DJ Delorie
- Does Microchip play fast and loose with the GPL?
- Prev by Date: Re: Does Microchip play fast and loose with the GPL?
- Next by Date: Re: A silly logic problem I cannot solve
- Previous by thread: Re: Does Microchip play fast and loose with the GPL?
- Next by thread: Re: Does Microchip play fast and loose with the GPL?
- Index(es):