Re: Using Makefile rather than GreenHills (GHS) Multi .GPJ files
- From: Hans-Bernhard Bröker <HBBroeker@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2008 23:48:44 +0200
zzmcclos@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Anyone using Make rather than gbuild/Multi? If so, have any advise
concerning doing this?
From second-hand experience I can say Green Hills' compilers don't need any special treatment by Makefiles. I.e. if you know your way around Make, there's nothing special to learn about using it with GHS. GHS even exports dependency information in a suitable format.
The trickiest aspect may be the selection of a Make tool that works well in a MS Windows surrounding, where people habitually don't care about letter case in filenames. Cygwin's port of GNU make is the usual choice, but for this application it may not be the optimal one.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Using Makefile rather than GreenHills (GHS) Multi .GPJ files
- From: David Brown
- Re: Using Makefile rather than GreenHills (GHS) Multi .GPJ files
- From: zzmcclos@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Using Makefile rather than GreenHills (GHS) Multi .GPJ files
- References:
- Using Makefile rather than GreenHills (GHS) Multi .GPJ files
- From: zzmcclos@xxxxxxxxx
- Using Makefile rather than GreenHills (GHS) Multi .GPJ files
- Prev by Date: Re: Linux serial port dropping bytes
- Next by Date: A Very Nice little embedded system
- Previous by thread: Using Makefile rather than GreenHills (GHS) Multi .GPJ files
- Next by thread: Re: Using Makefile rather than GreenHills (GHS) Multi .GPJ files
- Index(es):