Re: Large Wireless networks?
- From: Paul Keinanen <keinanen@xxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 12:06:30 +0300
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 00:53:45 -0400, CBFalconer <cbfalconer@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Polling 10k items in 15 minutes
from a single point leaves an absolute max of 9000 / 10k ~= 1 sec
per poll. That ignores any retransmissions needed.
You must have short seconds where you live, if you managed to get 9000
into 15 minutes :-).
In any half-duplex protocol, the Rx/Tx turnaround delay is critical in
order to get a decent throughput. Any receiver with ordinary IF and a
single PLL frequency synthesizer should be avoided, since the PLL
would have to swing from the Rx local oscillator frequency to the
transmit frequency, which can take a quite long time, before the
transmission can begin. Using a zero-IF receiver or separate PLLs for
Rx and Tx would be OK.
One way to reduce the effects of Rx/Tx delays would be to use a TDMA
system, in which the master sends a common sync message and each slave
has a time slot based on the node-ID in which it has to transmit. The
distances in the OP's case are so small, that the two-way propagation
delay is only a few microseconds, so you do not have to leave large
guard bands into the slot or use some GSM style propagation delay
compensation.
In TDMA or ordinary master/slave systems, in order to reduce the slave
power consumption, the master should use a fixed poll cycle, thus the
slave receiver could be turned of for most of the polling cycle and
be activated just slightly prior to the expected poll to this slave
(as in DVB-H).
Paul
.
- References:
- Large Wireless networks?
- From: Vladimir Vassilevsky
- Re: Large Wireless networks?
- From: CBFalconer
- Large Wireless networks?
- Prev by Date: Re: ATA Protocol
- Next by Date: Prada paypal wholesaler ( paypal accept ) ( www.sneakerbiz.cn ) High Prada paypal wholesaler ( paypal accept ) ( www.sneakerbiz.cn )
- Previous by thread: Re: Large Wireless networks?
- Next by thread: Re: Large Wireless networks?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|