Re: PMOS in parallel with NMOS
- From: Rocky <RobertGush@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 8 May 2008 01:22:24 -0700 (PDT)
On May 8, 5:20 am, rickman <gnu...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On May 7, 10:38 am, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe <t...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:<really big snip>
If you think all of this is unneeded, then please explain why the MCUDecaff rickman, decaff. Tomás is at least asking questions. I agree
I/O pin burned out when the LED didn't have a current limiting
resistor? And no BS. Either figure it out so that you understand it
and can explain it, or don't bother replying. The MCU is not burning
out why you think it is.- Hide quoted text -
that a bit more thought about forward voltage drop etc. is in order.
See the thread "Clock and Asynchronous Reset with just one pin". Tomás
would also be advised to study OHM's law.
Rocky
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: PMOS in parallel with NMOS
- From: Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
- Re: PMOS in parallel with NMOS
- From: rickman
- Re: PMOS in parallel with NMOS
- References:
- PMOS in parallel with NMOS
- From: Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
- Re: PMOS in parallel with NMOS
- From: robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: PMOS in parallel with NMOS
- From: Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
- Re: PMOS in parallel with NMOS
- From: rickman
- Re: PMOS in parallel with NMOS
- From: Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
- Re: PMOS in parallel with NMOS
- From: rickman
- Re: PMOS in parallel with NMOS
- From: Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
- Re: PMOS in parallel with NMOS
- From: rickman
- PMOS in parallel with NMOS
- Prev by Date: shopping to get beijing2008 tessera hap
- Next by Date: USB mass storage class selection
- Previous by thread: Re: PMOS in parallel with NMOS
- Next by thread: Re: PMOS in parallel with NMOS
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|