Re: How workable is Vista?
- From: Joerg <notthisjoergsch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 18:11:58 -0700
EventHelix.com wrote:
On Jun 16, 8:53 pm, rickman <gnu...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:I have been looking to buy a new computer for a bit and I had just
about decided on a Windows XP based system from Dell. Today I called
them and found that not only are they not going to sell XP machines
after tomorrow, but the orders are flooding in! It seems pretty crazy
to me that if XP is still that popular, they would stop selling it.
Is this something mandated by MicroSoft?
So the question is, is Vista ready for prime time? I have heard
nothing but bad about it and I know that a lot of software vendors
have yet to support it... at least the last time I looked. Are the
rumors true of Vista being a PITA or just plain incompatible? Is it
time to switch to Linux?
What experiences have people had with Vista?
Rick
Vista is OK performance wise but it is incompatible with older
programs like Visual C++ 6.0.
Here's a list that I found:
http://www.iexbeta.com/wiki/index.php/Windows_Vista_Software_Compatibility_List#Heavy_Problems.2C_Currently_Incompatible
You do need at least 2 GB of RAM for decent performance.
That's reason number xx why I don't have Vista. It's pathetic to need so much RAM.
--
Regards, Joerg
http://www.analogconsultants.com/
"gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam.
Use another domain or send PM.
.
- References:
- How workable is Vista?
- From: rickman
- Re: How workable is Vista?
- From: EventHelix.com
- How workable is Vista?
- Prev by Date: Re: How workable is Vista?
- Next by Date: Re: Sample DOSFS disk image file for testing
- Previous by thread: Re: How workable is Vista?
- Next by thread: Re: How workable is Vista?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|