Re: How workable is Vista?
- From: Joerg <notthisjoergsch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 08:40:23 -0700
Jim Granville wrote:
Stef wrote:In comp.arch.embedded,
The Real Andy <therealandy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
If you are an engineer and you want to fiddle with everything and run
outdated software, then Vista is a no go.
Ok, that's a no go for almost everyone in this group then. ;-)
Yes - With the 'want to run outdated software', changed to 'need to run outdated software' - version control often removes
option/luxury of 'want' ;)
Exactly. But it's not just engineers. Many businesses run legacy MRP systems and a change can be extremely expensive. MS used to have an ok attitude towards backward compatibility. That seems to have noticeably changed with Vista, to the point where they might discover that they just shot themselves in the foot.
Yesterday during the dog walk we met a friend who owns a business and just bought a round of new PCs. His comments about this new stuff consisted mostly of words like "stinks, pain in the neck, sluggish, resource hog" and so on.
--
Regards, Joerg
http://www.analogconsultants.com/
"gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam.
Use another domain or send PM.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: How workable is Vista?
- From: The Real Andy
- Re: How workable is Vista?
- References:
- How workable is Vista?
- From: rickman
- Re: How workable is Vista?
- From: The Real Andy
- Re: How workable is Vista?
- From: Stef
- Re: How workable is Vista?
- From: Jim Granville
- How workable is Vista?
- Prev by Date: Re: developing Application software for a host to communicate with a USB device
- Next by Date: Re: developing Application software for a host to communicate with a USB device
- Previous by thread: Re: How workable is Vista?
- Next by thread: Re: How workable is Vista?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|