Re: NAND flash misery
- From: Didi <dp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 09:29:32 -0700 (PDT)
Vladimir Vassilevsky wrote:
...
I was under impression that flash is more reliable then HDD; now I see
that it is not so. Do you know how reliable are the IDE flash drives?
Vladimir,
if flash were a viable and reliable replacement for HDDs this would
have
happened for years by now, the costs would have gone down. They are
not, and given their limited number of write cycles they are bound to
stay out of the way of normal disks (which have achieved an amazing
level of performance).
Thanks for posting the details you measured, I'll know now to not buy
a 2G SD-card for my camera (not that I need any more than the 1G I
have now, I have never used > 1/3 its capacity anyway :-) ).
Didi
------------------------------------------------------
Dimiter Popoff Transgalactic Instruments
http://www.tgi-sci.com
------------------------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/didi_tgi/sets/72157600228621276/
Original message: http://groups.google.com/group/comp.arch.embedded/msg/e9e96546454a52ab?dmode=source
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: NAND flash misery
- From: Dombo
- Re: NAND flash misery
- From: Jim Stewart
- Re: NAND flash misery
- From: cs_posting
- Re: NAND flash misery
- References:
- NAND flash misery
- From: Vladimir Vassilevsky
- NAND flash misery
- Prev by Date: NAND flash misery
- Next by Date: Re: Could any one clarify the below codes.
- Previous by thread: NAND flash misery
- Next by thread: Re: NAND flash misery
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
