Re: NAND flash misery
- From: Vladimir Vassilevsky <antispam_bogus@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 12:10:17 -0500
cs_posting@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Guess how many bad blocks are typical for NAND flash of several GB
capacity? As many as 2 percent! There could be the whole areas of
hundreds of megabytes of the contiguous bad cells, as well as the random
scatter.
I thought the IDE interface was supposed to hide that from the host by
mapping in spares?
It clearly does that, but only to a limited amount. Also, when a file gets broken because of the bad block, it is too late to replace it.
Isn't it also supposed to do wear leveling behind your back?
There is a whole lot of things that the internal controller could probably do; but we can only guess about what it actually does.
Vladimir Vassilevsky
DSP and Mixed Signal Design Consultant
http://www.abvolt.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: NAND flash misery
- From: John Devereux
- Re: NAND flash misery
- References:
- NAND flash misery
- From: Vladimir Vassilevsky
- Re: NAND flash misery
- From: cs_posting
- NAND flash misery
- Prev by Date: Re: NAND flash misery
- Next by Date: Re: NAND flash misery
- Previous by thread: Re: NAND flash misery
- Next by thread: Re: NAND flash misery
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|