Re: How workable is Vista?
- From: Didi <dp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 17:47:41 -0700 (PDT)
Vladimir Vassilevsky wrote:
Paul Keinanen wrote:
The Microsoft 9x family was quite useless for any serious
applications,
Like what?
Like any :-). Come on, you will not call this joke an OS?
XP is a lot stabler and might be called "a vastly bloated
and inefficient - but sort of working - OS", I suppose.
Didi
------------------------------------------------------
Dimiter Popoff Transgalactic Instruments
http://www.tgi-sci.com
------------------------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/didi_tgi/sets/72157600228621276/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: How workable is Vista?
- From: Vladimir Vassilevsky
- Re: How workable is Vista?
- From: Jerry McBride
- Re: How workable is Vista?
- References:
- How workable is Vista?
- From: rickman
- Re: How workable is Vista?
- From: Paul Keinanen
- Re: How workable is Vista?
- From: Vladimir Vassilevsky
- How workable is Vista?
- Prev by Date: Re: Thermopile Detector Voltage Amplification Module
- Next by Date: Re: Thermopile Detector Voltage Amplification Module
- Previous by thread: Re: How workable is Vista?
- Next by thread: Re: How workable is Vista?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|