Re: Good SVN client?

On Jun 30, 4:52 pm, larwe <zwsdot...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jun 30, 10:37 am, David Brown <da...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

absolutely nothing works the way you'd expect. Is there a simple-to-
use Win32 SVN client that does NOT have shell integration, and that

For Tortoise, all these are done using the "tortoise svn" menu in
explorer.  To check out a repository (or a directory within the

I do understand that, but nothing in Tortoise seems to work the way
I'd expect. Files updated by another team sometimes show up as
modified, sometimes not. I can hit refresh and still it shows with a
green checkmark. I can right-click the folder and update all, and it
doesn't change the files on my hard drive. Only when I manually go to
each file can I get the latest version. But this doesn't always
happen; it's random.


We have been using TortoiseSVN for about 18 months. From my point of
view it is great an actually works exactly as expected. We're using
it with XP. Also we are using the FSFS option on SVN.

I still haven't worked out how to compare two versions in the
repository.

RightClick->ShowLog then on the log right click on the file and select
ShowDifferences


It all seems to center around the fact that Tortoise relies on shell
integration and does all sorts of cutesy tricks. Using my RCS is a
modal operation for me anyway, I'd much rather have something that's a
standalone app.

Command line?

Rocky
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Good SVN client?
    ... use Win32 SVN client that does NOT have shell integration, ... For Tortoise, all these are done using the "tortoise svn" menu in ...  To check out a repository (or a directory within the ...
    (comp.arch.embedded)
  • Re: Good SVN client?
    ... use Win32 SVN client that does NOT have shell integration, ... For Tortoise, all these are done using the "tortoise svn" menu in ... I can right-click the folder and update all, ...
    (comp.arch.embedded)