TO ULF SAMUELSSON: Why "sigh" at uCLinux?
- From: C. J. Clegg <answer.to.newsgroup@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2008 17:42:25 -0400
Good afternoon, Ulf.
Back in November of 2007, in comp.arch.embedded, you wrote:
"I see as many ARM9 users as ARM7 users today and neither the CM3 or
the uC3k will meet the performance of the ARM9 and neither will run
Linux/WinCE. - uCLinux? ...sigh!"
I've only started reading about uCLinux over the last couple of days
but I was wondering why you "sigh" at it.
I'm told that the Atmel AVR32UC3A/B (and their associated eval boards,
the EVK1100/1) cannot run Linux because the processor doesn't have an
MMU... hence something like the AVR32-AP7, at a minimum, is needed.
On the other hand, uCLinux is specifically designed to run on
processors without MMUs. So, any reason why uCLinux cannot (or should
not) run on the AVR32UCA/B?
Certainly uCLinux has its limitations but if it's the only flavor of
Linux that will run on processors without an MMU, and the lack of MMU
is the reason why the UC3x can't run Linux, then I would think that a
uCLinux port for the UC3x would be welcomed by low-end processor
developers... would it not?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: TO ULF SAMUELSSON: Why "sigh" at uCLinux?
- From: Ulf Samuelsson
- Re: TO ULF SAMUELSSON: Why "sigh" at uCLinux?
- From: Frank Buss
- Re: TO ULF SAMUELSSON: Why "sigh" at uCLinux?
- From: Paul Keinanen
- Re: TO ULF SAMUELSSON: Why "sigh" at uCLinux?
- Prev by Date: Re: ARM9 boot up
- Next by Date: Re: TO ULF SAMUELSSON: Why "sigh" at uCLinux?
- Previous by thread: SDR SDRAM 16-bit vs 32-bit
- Next by thread: Re: TO ULF SAMUELSSON: Why "sigh" at uCLinux?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|