Re: An RTOS without Memory Managment

42Bastian Schick wrote:
On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 17:32:14 GMT, "FreeRTOS.org"
<noemail@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

whereas SafeRTOS (being safety critical) does not
permit dynamic memory allocation at all so these
buffers are provided statically by the application.

That´s why e.g. Sciopta handles the dynamic objects, so
their use is safe (with regard to "safety critical").

I am curious to know how having the operating system
handle dynamically created objects ensures safety,
or prevents problems associated with fragmentation.

--
Michael N. Moran (h) 770 516 7918
5009 Old Field Ct. (c) 678 521 5460
Kennesaw, GA, USA 30144 http://mnmoran.org

"So often times it happens, that we live our lives in chains
and we never even know we have the key."
"Already Gone" by Jack Tempchin (recorded by The Eagles)

The Beatles were wrong: 1 & 1 & 1 is 1
.