Re: Guarantee Critical Regions in Portable code. Portable Semaphores?
- From: "FreeRTOS.org" <noemail@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 07:16:10 -0000
"CBFalconer" <cbfalconer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4987642A.52BDC1E@xxxxxxxxxxxx
George Neuner wrote:
... snip ...
Microsoft has/had patents on the FAT implementations too and those
covered the 8.3 naming scheme. I'm not positive, but I think I
remember seeing that they have let the FAT12 and FAT16 patents lapse.
I think in the US it is now 20 years, although it used to be longer. The 20
years might just apply to patents granted since the time limit was changed.
.....but then I could be completely wrong.
--
Regards,
Richard.
+ http://www.FreeRTOS.org
Designed for microcontrollers. More than 7000 downloads per month.
+ http://www.SafeRTOS.com
Certified by TÜV as meeting the requirements for safety related systems.
.
- References:
- Re: Guarantee Critical Regions in Portable code. Portable Semaphores?
- From: Stefan Reuther
- Re: Guarantee Critical Regions in Portable code. Portable Semaphores?
- From: George Neuner
- Re: Guarantee Critical Regions in Portable code. Portable Semaphores?
- From: CBFalconer
- Re: Guarantee Critical Regions in Portable code. Portable Semaphores?
- Prev by Date: Re: Attention: European C/C++/C#/Java Programmers-Call for Input
- Next by Date: Programming a self test for a SPI FLASH memory?
- Previous by thread: Re: Guarantee Critical Regions in Portable code. Portable Semaphores?
- Next by thread: Re: Guarantee Critical Regions in Portable code. Portable Semaphores?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|